Uhh, I’m not reading this – I was searching for youtube videos when a bad link brought me here. :)
doug | August 2, 2006
I have long felt civilian nuclear power needs to be expanded to reduce need for increasinly costly oil etc. I have also come to believe global warming a serious problem. After 9/11 I became concerned about diversion of spent fuel, attacks on the plants themselves and so on. Recently, I have looked into efforts to burn WG Pu using Th as a more efficient mechanism. Fascinating stuff. Nice little blog that helps with my understanding on some of the, increasingly important, proliferation issues.
Dan | August 2, 2006
But Paul, is there an orders of magnitude difference between reading the blog and writing it? If so which is more geeky?
Amyfw | August 2, 2006
Not a geek, but I am a certified arms control wonk. Have been for years.
Jamie | August 2, 2006
Present and accounted for.
eCAHNomics | August 2, 2006
I resemble that.
nzruss | August 2, 2006
I have an RSS feed from this site on my google home page…. Feel a little tricked by this post though…
Sean-Paul | August 1, 2006
Oh no!!!!!! You got me. Dagnabit.
Andreas | August 1, 2006
Darn, isn’t that the truth of the day…
Victor | August 1, 2006
I check this site regularly 1-6 times a day; I consider it just as essential for understanding arms issues as any newspaper.
Sean-Paul | August 1, 2006
Wow, Victor, and I thought I was suffering from major geekage. ;-) LOL.
dan | August 2, 2006
I’ve got you all beat. I split my blog time between here and a couple of sites about tax law. Top that!
Andy | August 2, 2006
Uhh, I’m not reading this – I was searching for youtube videos when a bad link brought me here. :)
doug | August 2, 2006
I have long felt civilian nuclear power needs to be expanded to reduce need for increasinly costly oil etc. I have also come to believe global warming a serious problem. After 9/11 I became concerned about diversion of spent fuel, attacks on the plants themselves and so on. Recently, I have looked into efforts to burn WG Pu using Th as a more efficient mechanism. Fascinating stuff. Nice little blog that helps with my understanding on some of the, increasingly important, proliferation issues.
Dan | August 2, 2006
But Paul, is there an orders of magnitude difference between reading the blog and writing it? If so which is more geeky?
Amyfw | August 2, 2006
Not a geek, but I am a certified arms control wonk. Have been for years.
Jamie | August 2, 2006
Present and accounted for.
eCAHNomics | August 2, 2006
I resemble that.
nzruss | August 2, 2006
I have an RSS feed from this site on my google home page…. Feel a little tricked by this post though…
JJ | August 2, 2006
Guilty (yet proud)! :-)
Paul | August 2, 2006
busted!
Max Postman | August 3, 2006
I prefer “wonk,” but yes, checking it several times a day.
Matt | August 3, 2006
:)
Michael Roston | August 3, 2006
I’m so geeky that I frequently forget to read yr blog cuz the dang RSS feed isn’t working.